Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Blatt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1941No. Appeal, 201PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curíam,

This is an action of- trespass to recover damages for injuries- sustained by the wife plaintiff. -■ Prom the judgment entered on a directed verdict in defendant’s favor,' plaintiffs appeal.

For more than a year prior to the accident, plaintiffs had lived, as tenants, in an apartment on the second floor front of a building owned by defendant. There was a bathroom in. the, center of the. .second. floor for the use of the plaintiffs and other tenants on that floor. To reach .the bathroom, from plaintiffs’ apartment, it was necessary to walk along a hallway and descend two steps. ,At…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffner Et Ux. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Fay v. 900 North 63d Street Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller-DuPont, Inc. v. ServiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Beitch v. MishkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Care v. Berger, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API