Legal Opinion
Brusco v. Miller
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided November 29, 1995PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered September 29, 1994 reversed, with $10 costs, tenants’ motion to dismiss the petition is denied, and the petition is reinstated.
At issue in this nonpayment summary proceeding for possession of rent-stabilized apartment premises is the legal sufficiency of landlords’ written three-day rent demand (RPAPL 711 [2]). The demand enumerated outstanding rent payable at the rate of $850 per month for a specified five-month period, and advised that payment of "all rent due and owing” or surrender of the premises was required by a date certain, failing which, summary…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- MSG Pomp Corp. v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Jackson v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
- Schwartz v. Weiss-NewellCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976
- Lanz v. LifrieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- London Terrace Gardens v. StevensCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Bank v. Cooper, Paroff, Cooper & CookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Related Tiffany v. FaustAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002
- John Washington, Ltd. v. GulbreathAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997
- Kulok v. Riddim Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2000
- Rector, Churchwardens & Vestrymen of Trinity Church v. Chung King House of Metal, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.