Legal Opinion

Jackson v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 17, 1976PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

Order dated February 20, 1976 (Nolan, J.) affirmed, with $10 costs.

Once again we call the attention of the bar to the loose usage of the terms "jurisdictional defect” or "jurisdictionally defective” in summary proceedings. Where, as here, the Civil Court has jurisdiction of the subject of the proceedings under article 7 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law and jurisdiction of the person of the respondent has been obtained as provided by law, the proceeding is not "jurisdictionally defective” (Rosgro Realty Co. v Braynen, 70 Misc 2d 808, affd sub nom. Grosfeld v Braynen, 41 AD2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosgro Realty Co. v. BraynenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1972
  2. People ex rel. Upchurch v. GittlesonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. Ferro v. LavineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Cal Cal Realty Corp. v. TaylorAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1970

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. 433 West Associates v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Brusco v. MillerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995
  3. Lanz v. LifrieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Cannon v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1994
  5. McClelland v. RobinsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API