Legal Opinion
Warner-Lambert Co., Inc. In No. 83-1682 v. United Retail and Wholesale Employee's Teamster Local No. 115 Pension Plan, in No. 83-1676
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 30, 1986No. 83-1676, 83-1682PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.
I
The Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”), Pub. L. No. 96-364, 1980 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad. News (94 Stat.) 1208 (amending the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (1982)), was enacted out of a concern that ERISA did not adequately protect multiemployer pension plans from the adverse consequences that result when individual employers terminate their participation or withdraw. See Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. R.A. Gray & Co., 467 U.S. 717, 104 S.Ct. 2709, 81 L.Ed.2d 601…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bradshaw v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Terson Company, Inc. v. Bakery Drivers and Salesmen Local 194Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ilgwu National Retirement Fund, Sol C. Chaikin and Joseph Moore v. Levy Bros. Frocks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Pittsburgh MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 66Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Flying Tiger Line v. Teamsters Pension Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- The Flying Tiger Line, a Delaware Corporation, Tiger International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Warren Transport, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, & Counterdefendants v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, A/K/A Teamsters Pension Plan of Philadelphia and Vicinity, and Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., Counterplaintiffs v. Central States, Southwest and Southeast Areas Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Local 641 Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, and Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Each Sued Individually and as a Member of a Class of Similarly Situated Multiemployer Pension Plans Who Assert Withdrawal Liability, Against Hall's Motor Transit Company, Under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. Appeal of the Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Tiger International Inc. And Warren Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.