Legal Opinion
State v. Pickel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 1, 2010No. AC 30558PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The defendant, Drice Pickel, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of escape in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-169 (a) (2). The defendant claims that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts, which the jury reasonably could have found, and procedural history are relevant. On November 6, 2002, the defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of failure to appear in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-173 (a) (1). The court imposed a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. LubusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. WorthamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. Na'im B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. SaezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. McGeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. TestaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. FernandezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. PickelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. PickelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010