Legal Opinion

State v. Saez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 23, 2009No. AC 28209PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEST, J.

The defendant, Javier L. Saez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of larceny in the sixth degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-119 (9) and 53a-125b 1 and, subsequently, by guilty plea, of being a persistent larceny offender in violation of General Statutes § 53a-40 (e). 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support his conviction of larceny in the sixth degree. 3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On May 5, 2005, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. MeehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. State v. ReddickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. State v. PorterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. State v. OsoriaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ReidConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. State v. PapandreaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. State v. McRaeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. State v. Roy D. L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  5. State v. PickelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API