Legal Opinion

New Market Investment Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-1537PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

The plaintiff, New Market Investment Corporation, is a Pennsylvania corporation and successor in interest to Frupac International Corporation, an importer of Chilean fruit to the United States, principally through the port of Philadelphia. The plaintiff was referred to at trial as “Frupac”, and the Court will so refer to the plaintiff in this Memorandum. The defendant, Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company (“Fireman’s Fund”), is a Delaware Corporation engaged in the business of insurance. Fireman’s Fund insured Frupac’s fruit shipped from Chile to its…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Mohn v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Williamson v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  2. Griffiths v. Cigna Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Cipriani v. Lycoming County Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Valentin v. Crozer-Chester Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. United Airlines, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API