Legal Opinion
Moore v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1933No. 7196, 7197PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
The above-entitled causes, hereinafter referred to' as the Anderson case and the Graham ease, involve similar questions of law and were heard together in the District Court on motion to dissolve and on motion to modify the temporary injunctions herein.
On the application of the appellees, the court below issued temporary injunctions commanding the appellants (1) to desist from diverting the waters of the Sunnyside Canal and laterals therefrom as described in the bills of complaint, from the lands known as old supplemental water right lands, comprising about 28,700…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Colorado v. TollSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Warner Valley Stock Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Gnerich v. RutterSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Mid-Northern Oil Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Neher v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Fox v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Ernest v. FleissnerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1941
- Hartmann v. Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
- Wheeler v. FarleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.