Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 2, 1973PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

This is an appeal from a post-conviction order denying the petitioner relief from his entry of a plea of guilty. He appeals.

The record establishes that the interrelationship of two problems underlies this appeal. One is the effect of plea bargaining leading to a guilty plea; the other, that of adequacy of counsel.

The post-convietion court made an express finding of fact:

“2. Trial counsel for petitioner advised him that if the sole basis of his guilty plea was the denial of his Motion to Suppress, he could have the denial of that motion reviewed through post-conviction proceedings.”

*606The state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. North v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. AbelOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Dixon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Richardson v. WilliardOregon Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. People v. JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Braxton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. State v. FelgerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Dorsey v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API