Manes v. M.O.V.E., Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
Appellant requests this Court to hold that “the award of the Arkansas Worker’s Compensation Commission is not supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.” However, appellant has not abstracted the opinion or award of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission nor the judgment or decree of the circuit court approving the Commission’s award, if any. Supreme Court Rule 9(d) provides:
“The appellant’s abstract or abridgment of the record should consist of an impartial condensation.. . of only such material parts of the pleadings, proceedings, facts, documents, and other…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reliable Finance Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eaton v. Supreme Court of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Russell v. PryorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Farrco Construction Co. v. GolemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Wade v. Franklin-Stricklin Land Surveyors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.