Farrco Construction Co. v. Goleman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
DARRELL HICKMAN, Justice.
This is an appeal of a Workers’ Compensation case by Farreo Construction Company and its insurance carrier. The appellant did not abstract the administrative trial judge’s opinion, the Workers’ Compensation Commission decision nor the circuit court order, all of which favored appellee, Webster Goleman. We find this a violation of Rule 9(d) of the Supreme Court Rules.
We cannot distinguish this case from Manes v. M.O.V.E., Inc., et al, 261 Ark. 793, 552 S.W. 2d 211 (1977) where we affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Commission order because the order was not abstracted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Bank of Ozark v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Manes v. M.O.V.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Wade v. Franklin-Stricklin Land Surveyors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Winters v. EldersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Jolly v. HartjeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Burgess v. BurgessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Cash v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987