Legal Opinion

Farrco Construction Co. v. Goleman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 19, 1979No. 79-277PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DARRELL HICKMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal of a Workers’ Compensation case by Farreo Construction Company and its insurance carrier. The appellant did not abstract the administrative trial judge’s opinion, the Workers’ Compensation Commission decision nor the circuit court order, all of which favored appellee, Webster Goleman. We find this a violation of Rule 9(d) of the Supreme Court Rules.

We cannot distinguish this case from Manes v. M.O.V.E., Inc., et al, 261 Ark. 793, 552 S.W. 2d 211 (1977) where we affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Commission order because the order was not abstracted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Bank of Ozark v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Manes v. M.O.V.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Wade v. Franklin-Stricklin Land Surveyors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Winters v. EldersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Jolly v. HartjeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Burgess v. BurgessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Cash v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API