Legal Opinion

Reliable Finance Co. v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 10, 1972No. 5-5963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In disposing of this rather complicated case the trial court made seven separate findings, some of law, some of fact, some of mixed law and fact. The decree of the chancellor is not abstracted and therefore we are left without the benefit of those conclusions. The omissioh violates our Rule 9 (d) because an abstract of thé decree in this case is “necessary to an understanding of all questions presented to this court for decision..."Tudor v. Tudor, 247 Ark. 822, 448 S.W. 2d 17 (1969); Weir v. Hill, 237 Ark. 922, 377 S.W. 2d 178 (1964); Pyramid Life Ins. Co. v. Hamilton, 237 Ark. 797, 376 S.W.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weir v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. Tudor v. TudorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Pyramid Life Ins. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Davidson v. MessingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manes v. M.O.V.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Evans v. Commercial National Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Knabe v. BallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Loveless v. City of ClarendonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API