Love v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
This is an appeal from a conviction sustained by the defendant Jesse Love in the county court of Garfield county. -
Two propositions are presented by the appeal, to wit: First, the officers making the search did not have a legal search Avarrant, and the search made thereunder was unreasonable. Second, the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction.
These questions are so closely related that for the purpose of disposing of them they may be considered together.
In support of the first proposition, the record discloses that prior to the trial, counsel for defendant filed a motion to suppress…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tacker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Chanosky v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- Plumlee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kizer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Tanique, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics & Dangerous DrugsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Hood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.