Legal Opinion
Hood v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 18, 1950No. A-11069PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
Homer Gafford and Jacqueline Hood were charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county with possession of nine pints of tax-paid whisky. They filed a motion to suppress, with was overruled, counsel then filed a motion for severance, praying that the defendants be tried separately, which was overruled, and thereafter defendants were tried before a jury, and neither testified. At the close of the state’s case, each defendant demurred to the evidence, and Homer Gafford’s demurrer was sustained, but the demurrer of Jacqueline Hood was overruled. The jury found said defendant guilty of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sturgis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Bond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Plumlee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
- Love v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
- Flauhaut v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crossland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- Kizer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- State v. CarterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.