Plumlee v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtJones, P. J.
The defendants, Jimmie Plumlee and William Plumlee, were jointly charged by information filed in the county court of Murray county with the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, were tried, convieted and sentenced to serve 30 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $75, and have appealed.
Tt is first contended that the court erred in overruling the motion to suppress evidence presented by the defendants.
At the beginning of the trial, counsel for defendants dictated into the record a motion to suppress all testimony concerning the seizure of the intoxicating liquor in question for the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Clasby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kizer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Phinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Shiever v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- Hood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.