Legal Opinion
DePalma v. Rosen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 30, 1972No. 42964, 43307PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Todd, Justice.
These appeals were consolidated for hearing in this court. In No. 42964, plaintiff, Nick DePalma, appeals from a judgment dismissing an action he commenced against individual members of the city council of the city of St. Paul and from an order denying his motion to vacate that judgment and to substitute the city of St. Paul as defendant. In No. 43307, DePalma appeals from a summary judgment for defendant in an action subsequently commenced against the city of St. Paul. The judgment dismissing the claim against the individual members of the city council of the city of St. Paul…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Roerig v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Stewart v. CaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Wilbrecht v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- McCorkell v. City of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Brown v. Dayton Hudson Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- City of Minneapolis v. MeldahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Troxel v. Town of BasaltColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brown v. Dayton Hudson Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981