Legal Opinion
Patrick Novak v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 30, 2015No. 13-16383PublishedCited by 166 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CLIFTON; Concurrence by Judge FRIEDLAND.
OPINION
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:
This action challenges the constitutionality of the Jones Act’s cabotage provisions, which prohibit foreign competition in the domestic shipping market. Plaintiffs allege that these provisions impair interstate trade between Hawaii and the rest of the United States to such an extent that they violate the Constitution. . The district court dismissed the action with prejudice, concluding that Plaintiffs failed to satisfy what it framed as prudential standing requirements because they alleged only generalized…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Shawna Hartmann v. California Department of Corr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Kelsey Rose Juliana v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Committee to Protect our Agricultural Water v. Occidental Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Robillard v. Opal Labs, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.