Legal Opinion

Hull v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc., 2007-Ca-00183 (3-10-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2008No. 2007-CA-00183PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee Barbara Hull appeals a summary judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County, Ohio, entered in favor of defendants-appellees/cross-appellants, J.C. Penney Company, Inc. and Barbara Pearles. Appellant assigns a single error to the trial court:

{¶ 2} "I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING APPELLEES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT."

{¶ 3} Appellant argues the court's decision regarding the statute of limitations was wrong as a matter of law and also maintains there are genuine issues of material fact.

{¶ 4} Civ. R. 56 (C) states in pertinent part:

{…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zieber v. Heffelfinger, 08ca0042 (3-17-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LPOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Young v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Mental RetardationOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API