Legal Opinion
Morrison v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 26, 1989No. WD 41418PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAITAN, Presiding Judge.
Movant, Fred Lee Morrison, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion Without Evidentiary Hearing. The movant alleges that the motion court erred in denying his motion because he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that counsel: (1) failed to file motions to suppress out-of-court and in-court identifications of mov-ant; (2) failed to timely object to the prosecution’s comments regarding movant’s failure to volunteer exculpatory explanations during police interrogation; (3) failed to timely object to the prosecution’s alleged deliberate distortion of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Etter, Inc. v. NeillMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. PrestonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. BealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. LambertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.