Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Etter, Inc. v. Neill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 2002No. ED 80150PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge.

Relator, Etter, Inc., filed a petition for a writ of prohibition to require respondent to transfer venue. We issued a preliminary order. Because we find no grounds for St. Louis City venue based merely on the residence of a defendant ad litem and no waiver of venue, the preliminary order in prohibition is made absolute, thus requiring transfer.

In 2001, plaintiffs brought the underlying dram-shop action against two St. Louis County bar-owners. In their suit, they claim the St. Louis County bars served drinks to an obviously drunk patron who then assaulted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wolff Shoe Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Rothermich v. GallagherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Baker v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. State Ex Rel. Director of Revenue v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Webb v. SatzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. SSM Health Care St. Louis v. NeillSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. State Ex Rel. McDonald's Corp. v. MidkiffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  3. Talley v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Montgomery v. South County Radiologists, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State ex rel. Bank of America N.A. v. KanatzarMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API