Legal Opinion

State v. Lambert

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1995No. 19936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Judge.

Lonnie Lambert (defendant) was convicted, following a jury trial, of possession of cocaine, a controlled substance. § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993. He appeals contending the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial during the state’s closing argument because the prosecuting attorney personalized her argument to the jury, and that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the meaning of reasonable doubt. This court affirms.

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence upon which he was convicted. It is, therefore, not necessary to set forth a detailed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State v. RaspberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. State v. OldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Cardona-RiveraMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. JoosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. SumlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API