Legal Opinion
Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 17, 2003No. 01-7115PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:
The action in this case was filed under section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 and 26, the antitrust laws of foreign nations, and international law, on behalf of all foreign purchasers of certain vitamins, vitamin premixes, and bulk vitamin products and precursors, against a number of corporations, both foreign and domestic, who distribute and sell these vitamin products around…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Acree, Clifford v. Repub IraqCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Runkle v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Hisler v. Gallaudet UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Flynn v. Veazey Construction Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.