Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Veazey Construction Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2004No. Civil Action 03-0745 (RMU)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Plaintiffs Leave to File a Sur-Reply; Denying the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a sur-reply and on the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer. The plaintiffs seek to recover delinquent contributions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. First, because the defendants raise arguments for the first time in their reply, the court grants the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hockett v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Gipson v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Price v. GreenspanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- United States Ex Rel. Green v. Service Contract Education & Training Trust FundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Mazzarino v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.