Legal Opinion

In Re the Disbarment of Braggans

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1979No. 47326PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding of long duration which has been unduly protracted in a futile effort to permit the respondent Braggans to address the psychological problems with which he is afflicted, and to afford him an opportunity to continue his practice of law. No moral turpitude was alleged in any of the original charges against him. It is now evident that for the protection of the public he must be and hereby is disbarred.

No useful purpose would be served in detailing the numerous instances of inexcusable neglect which have characterized his handling of clients’ matters. In July 1972…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against FlanerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API