City of Springfield v. Goff
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Section 89.060, RSMo 1994, permits thirty percent of the landowners affected by a zoning change to file a petition protesting the change to the legislative body of a municipality. In that event, the zoning ordinance does not take effect unless two-thirds of the members of the municipality’s legislative body vote in favor of the change. The City of Springfield, Missouri, a charter city, adopted charter section 11.18. The charter provision recognizes as valid a protest petition signed by ten percent of the affected landowners and requires that three-quarters of the members of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nigro v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Bloodworth v. Stuart Ex Rel. StuartTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. St. Louis Fire Fighters Ass'n Local No. 73 v. StemmlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State Ex Inf. Hannah Ex Rel. Christ v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hazelwood Yellow Ribbon Committee v. KlosMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Boland-Maloney Lumber Co. v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
- City of St. Louis v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Petti v. Goodwin-RafteryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Chastain v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.