Boland-Maloney Lumber Co. v. Burnett
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINE, Judge.
The appellant, Boland-Maloney Lumber Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Boland-Malo-ney”), appeals to this Court from a jury verdict in a negligence action involving an injury which occurred on a staircase. Bo-land-Maloney argues that the appellee Douglas Burnett failed to present a prima facie case of negligence against it, that the trial court denied Boland-Maloney its fundamental right to apportionment against a dismissed codefendant, and that it is entitled to a new trial. We disagree. Douglas Burnett cross-appeals, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial on the sole issue…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Scifres v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Pathways, Inc. v. HammonsKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kendall v. GodbeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
- Southard v. BelangerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Brooks v. Seaton Place Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
- Gleason v. NighswanderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
- Bradley v. BSL Express Trucking, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.