Burdick v. Schmitt
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Taber, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Second judicial district court, Washoe County, and from an order of said court denying a motion for new trial. Appellant was plaintiff in the action in the court below, and the original defendant was E. J. Seaborn, superintendent of banks. Leo P. Schmitt, as receiver of Tonopah Banking Corporation, was later substituted as defendant. In this opinion appellant will be designated plaintiff, and said banking corporation as the bank.
In October, 1932, appellant handed the bank, for collection, an investment certificate issued…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Citizens Bank v. Bradley, ExaminerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Young v. Teutonia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Luckehe v. First Nat. Bk. of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Guignon v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Savings Bank v. National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First National Bank v. HenningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Balsa Ecuador Lumber Corp. v. Security National BankDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1956
- Beane v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of AshevilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937