Legal Opinion

Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Button

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1932No. Civil No. 3093PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.

The superior court of Yuma county denied the Security Trust and Savings Bank a preference upon a claim for $34,439.63 filed with James B. Button as superintendent of banks and ex-officio receiver of the Yuma Valley Bank, and it has appealed from this order.

The record discloses that the Security Trust and Savings Bank and the Yuma Valley Bank were both doing a general banking business in the city of Yuma and that on June 20, 1930, the latter closed its doors and was taken over by the state superintendent of banks for liquidation. Two days before this occurred the Yuma Valley Bank drew a draft…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bank of Poplar Bluff v. MillspaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. Federal Reserve Bank v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  3. The People v. . Merchants and Mechanics' Bk.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Messenger v. Carroll Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Hecker-Jones-Jewell Milling Co. v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The Murray Co. v. ButtonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Chicago Fire & Marine Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
  3. California Livestock Commission Co. v. ButtonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Co. v. ButtonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. In Re Yuma Valley BankArizona Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API