State v. Theobald
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNeill, J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction of second-degree burglary. His court appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and the state has moved to dismiss the appeal as frivolous.
The prerequisites to withdrawal of counsel and dismissal of an appeal for lack of potential merit are stated in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967):
[Defense counsel’s] role as advocate requires that he support his client’s appeal to the best of his ability. Of course, if counsel finds his case to be wholly frivolous, after a conscientious examination of it,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. BrittonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. Van AukenWashington Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- State v. HairstonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HairstonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- State v. DepazWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. DepazWashington Supreme Court · 2009
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.