Legal Opinion

State v. Depaz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2009No. 80574-1PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 — Vasquez Depaz challenges his conviction for child rape on the grounds that the trial court abused its discretion when it dismissed a known holdout juror. Depaz urges this court to extend its decision in State v. Elmore, 155 Wn.2d 758, 123 P.3d 72 (2005), to limit the trial court’s discretion under RCW 2.36.110 in deciding whether to remove a holdout juror. We reject Depaz’s request to extend Elmore because the concerns present in a case involving juror nullification are not present in a case involving the removal of a juror for communicating with a third party. We also decline the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. RafayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. Sassen Van ElslooWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State Of Washington v. Mario R Guevara-diazCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Hough v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Hough v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API