Legal Opinion

HI-G, INCORPORATED v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 14, 1967No. Civ. A. 65-815PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCIS J. W. FORD, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action to recover under a manufacturer’s output insurance policy issued to it by defendant to recover for a loss caused by the damaging of certain relays during the course of the manufacturing process.

Plaintiff has a manufacturing plant in Windsor Locks, Connecticut, where, among other products, it makes small electro-mechanical switching devices known as relays. In the course of manufacture these relays are placed in an industrial oven for a period of several hours. A vacuum pump attached to the oven is operated to create a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. A. L. Myrick, D/B/A Market Produce CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanover New England Insurance v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  2. Richland Valley Products, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  3. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Industrial Risk InsurersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Hi-G, Incorporated v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
  5. Mc Quade v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API