Legal Opinion

Hi-G, Incorporated v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 27, 1968No. 7016PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This diversity action to recover on an insurance policy covering “direct physical loss * * * or damage * * * from any external cause” should, conced.edly, result in a finding for the insured unless barred by the policy’s exclusion clause. The presently material portion of that clause is as follows:

“Loss or damage caused by or resulting from dampness of atmosphere, dryness of atmosphere, extremes or changes of temperature, shrinkage, evaporation, loss of weight, rust, contamination, change in flavor or color or texture or finish, unless such loss or damage is caused directly by fire,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. A. L. Myrick, D/B/A Market Produce CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. HI-G, INCORPORATED v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Parks Real Estate Purchasing Group v. St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Duensing v. Traveler's CompaniesMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Richland Valley Products, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Industrial Risk InsurersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Clover Leaf Dairy v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API