Legal Opinion

Richland Valley Products, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 28, 1996No. 94-1837PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

St. Paul Fire & Casualty Company appeals from a judgment for $9,098,545.65 in favor of Richland Valley Products for breach of contract and for bad faith denial of Richland's insurance claim, and from a judgment in favor of Richland Valley Products awarding taxable costs in the amount of $31,178.39. We conclude that the dispositive issue is whether, as a matter of law, St. Paul's policy covered Richland's loss. Because we conclude the loss is not covered, we reverse without reaching the other issues presented in the appeal and Richland's cross-appeal.

Both parties moved for summary judgment.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gonzalez Ex Rel. Bichler v. City of FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. A. L. Myrick, D/B/A Market Produce CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. Girouard v. Circuit Court for Jackson CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Parks Real Estate Purchasing Group v. St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Hirschhorn v. Auto-Owners InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Bruner v. Heritage CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  5. Arnold v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API