Legal Opinion
Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Industrial Risk Insurers
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 14, 1981No. 1758PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this appeal, we are asked to interpret the exclusion clause contained in an all risk policy of insurance.
On June 5, 1978, a tank truck owned by Matlack, Inc. and carrying No. 2 fuel oil arrived at the premises of appellee, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., in Manheim, Lancaster County. Appellee’s purchasing department, acting under the mistaken assumption that the truck was carrying heptane, directed the truck to Department P-30 and informed the foreman that a heptane truck was on the way. The foreman was unavailable to direct the truck and review the bill of lading. Therefore, he…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. Boston Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. A. L. Myrick, D/B/A Market Produce CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Frisch v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Shamey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Dubuque Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Clifford Caylor, Fayne Caylor and Merle Caylor, Doing Business as Caylor Brothers Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Reliance Insurance v. MoessnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Standard Structural Steel Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Auten v. Employers National Inurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Richland Valley Products, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Graham v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.