Legal Opinion

Akers v. Stirn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1940No. 27495PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

There are two questions for review. The first is whether there was sufficient evidence of wanton misconduct upon the part of defendant, Chaplin, to make a-jury question. The second concerns the refusal of the trial court to give a requested special charge.

Early in the afternoon of September 2, 1936, defendant was driving from Lima to Payne, Ohio, northerly on route 115, a straight, level highway consisting of an eighteen-foot, hard, cement surface and a solid berm on each side of sufficient width for an automoile to pass on the outside of the hard cement surface. In the automobile with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Morrow v. Hume, Admx.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Vecchio v. VecchioOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hubach v. ColeOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. SharpOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kennard v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hamby v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. State v. WhitakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Tighe v. DiamondOhio Court of Appeals · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API