Legal Opinion

Hubach v. Cole

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1938No. 26515PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

One engaged in ministering to the physical ills of mankind ought not to be victimized in a malpractice action by a designing patient with a fictitious grievance. On the other hand, a patient who is the victim of actionable negligence at the hands of a physician should be compensated for the results of such negligence.

We are not confronted with the problem of whether a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff or defendant herein can be legally upheld, but are called upon to determine whether the trial court committed reversible error in arresting the evidence from the jury at the conclusion of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Benson v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Schieffelin v. . HylanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Lyons v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Cromer v. Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Akron (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Akers v. StirnOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Buerger v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API