Hamby v. Hamby
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
The defendant in error, in this opinion referred to as the plaintiff, makes the point that on the trial there was no motion for directed verdict, and that the failure to make the motion constituted a waiver of the right of the defendant to insist on the ground “that the verdict was without evidence to support it.” The Federal Rule of Practice is that unless a motion that a verdict be ordered by the court is presented to the court, the sufficiency of the evidence will not be passed upon by the Circuit Court of Appeals. The Federal Rule of Practice is that where there is no-…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Blanchard v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Miller v. FairleyOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Lee v. LottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Vecchio v. VecchioOhio Supreme Court · 1936
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Dykes v. HammockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Fuels, Inc. v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Record Truck Line, Inc. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Hamby v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.