Legal Opinion

Litchfield v. Cox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1966No. 33PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

To establish a case against the defendant for alienation of his wife’s affections, the law imposes upon the plaintiff, Litchfield, the burden of showing, by competent evidence, the following: “(1) That he and his wife were happily married, and that a genuine love and affection existed between them; (2) that the love and affection so existing was alienated and destroyed; (3) that the wrongful and malicious acts of the defendants produced and brought about the loss and alienation of such love and affection. Hankins v. Hankins, 202 N.C. 358, 162 S.E. 766.” Ridenhour v. Miller, 225 N.C. 543, 35…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hankins v. . HankinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Ridenhour v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCutchen v. McCutchenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Chappell v. ReddingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Andrews v. PattersonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API