Legal Opinion
Rosen v. SCIL, LLC
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 8, 2003No. 1-03-0814PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karnezis
This interlocutory appeal arises as a result of disputed charges on plaintiffs Saks Fifth Avenue credit card. The issue on appeal is whether an arbitration clause in an amended credit card agreement is enforceable.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Richard Rosen, filed a class action lawsuit against defendants, SCIL, LLC, Saks Incorporated and DOES 1 through 10, disputing two charges of “fictitious taxes” on his Saks Fifth Avenue credit card. Defendants filed a motion to compel arbitration and to stay the proceedings pursuant to an amendment to plaintiffs credit card agreement permitting either party to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Walther v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Scott v. Cingular WirelessWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Estate of Dorothy Da v. Wells FargoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.