Legal Opinion

Walther v. Sovereign Bank

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 20, 2005No. 61, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHELL, Judge.

This case involves the enforceability of an arbitration agreement entered into as part of a second mortgage loan contract between David and Tamera Walther, petitioners, and Sover*417eign Bank, the assignee of the loan contract and respondent in the case at bar.

Petitioners present two questions for our review, which we rephrase for the sake of clarity as follows:

I. Is an arbitration clause contained in a “Direct Loan Note & Truth in Lending Disclosures” agreement between petitioner and a lender unconscionable and therefore unenforceable?

II. Did respondent waive the arbitration…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Salley v. Option One Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Delta Funding Corp. v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. 100 Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Columbia Town Center Title Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API