Legal Opinion

Frei v. Frei

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1953PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The plaintiff complained that while in the employ of the defendant he was engaged in using a corn-picking and husking machine which was defective, unsafe, and out of order “in that the gathering chains were so worn and defective that they could no.t be tightened sufficiently, thereby causing them to run loose, flop, and have considerable play. That on said day and before the injury sustained by the plaintiff . . . the plaintiff informed the defendant of the dangerous condition of said gathering chains and requested that the same be repaired and made safe by replacement with, new chains, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scory v. LaFaveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Yerkes v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Fandek v. Barnett & Record Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Nickas v. HinesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Schiro v. Oriental Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ferguson v. LounsberryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Maus v. BlossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Taft v. DerricksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API