Belser v. Achley
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
This appeal is predicated upon the contention that the trial judge, opposing eoun- sel, and one of the jurors were guilty of misconduct upon the trial. The transactions complained of are presented in part hy a bystanders’ bill of exceptions, but there seems to be no material differences between the several versions of those transactions. Appellees have filed no brief in the case.
In his fourth proposition appellant complains of certain statements made by counsel for appellees in his argument to the jury. The record shows, however, that appellant withdrew his objections to that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Texas Midland R.R. Co. v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Parker v. BaileyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Humble Pipe Line Co. v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. AdcockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Smith v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Bell v. New Jersey Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938