Legal Opinion

Krizanek v. Smith

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 4, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tunnell, Justice,

delivering the opinion of the court:

Although the merits of the action are not now before us, it is, nevertheless, necessary to understand something of the nature of the whole case in order to dispose of the instant appeal.

The Biggs Boiler Works Company is a Delaware corporation. One-half of all its outstanding common stock is owned by plaintiff, the other half by Theofil E. Krizanek, who, in the capacity of a voting trustee, is one of the defendants. On the 6th day of December, 1950, at Cleveland, Ohio, the plaintiff and Krizanek executed an instrument purporting to be a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  4. Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  5. Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Lilienfeld's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. TenneyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  2. INTERN. HARVESTER CO. v. MannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Arden-Mayfair, Inc. v. Louart Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
  4. Haas v. HaasCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
  5. Haas v. HaasCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API