Legal Opinion

Cantor v. Sachs

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 14, 1932PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The statute under which the order of seizure was entered is found in its present amended form in 36 Del. Laws, Ch. 268. It is known as paragraph 3850, § 7, of the Revised Code 1915. It is as follows:

“3850, Sec. 7. Orders for Appearance; Upon Failure of Service and Affidavit; Publication of; Upon Default; Decree Pro Gonfesso; Enforcement by Seizure or Delivery of Property Demanded; Payment Upon Security for Restitution; Proceedings if Security Not Given; Foreign Attachment:—If, after subpoena or other process issued, any defendant therein named shall not appear in obedience to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  2. Schoon v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. PyottCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
  4. Collison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  5. Strout v. BurgessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API