Legal Opinion
Arden-Mayfair, Inc. v. Louart Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided March 15, 1978PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Vice Chancellor.
The defendant Louart Corporation, a California corporation, as well as its president, Marshall I. Kass, and its vice president, Henry L. Melczer, (hereafter “the Louart defendants”) have moved to dismiss the complaint against them on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction over the person and for insufficiency of service of process. The plaintiff, Arden-Mayfair, Inc., (hereafter “Arden-Mayfair”) is a Delaware corporation which maintains its principal business activities in California.
At the root of the controversy are California statutes, effective January 1, 1977, which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jacobs v. TenneyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- U. S. Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Diversacon Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. F. Browne GreggCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Istituto Bancario Italiano SpA v. Hunter Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Bailey v. WoelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Tuckman v. Aerosonic Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control v. PhillipsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
- Papendick v. BoschSuperior Court of Delaware · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.