Legal Opinion

Wells v. Union Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1938No. Civ. 2130PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for declaratory relief and an accounting. The controversy arose over the terms of an oil lease executed in April, 1919. It concerned the legal liability of the parties to pay local improvement assessments levied on leased lands. The trial court held such assessments payable by plaintiffs and they have appealed.

The determination of this issue depends on the interpretation to be placed on paragraph eight of the oil lease which provides as follows:

“TAXES: The Lessee (defendant) shall, during the term of this lease, pay all taxes which may be levied upon or assessed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Boyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Anaheim Sugar Co. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. County of Fresno v. MalmstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Mitchel v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Nourse v. KovacevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. County of San Bernardino v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API