Legal Opinion

Belmont v. Umpqua Sand & Gravel, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1975PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C. J.

This is an action to recover the value of river gravel alleged to have been removed from plaintiffs’ property. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of defendant.

Plaintiffs and defendant own adjoining parcels of property along the South Umpqua River in Douglas County. Defendant is engaged in the sand and gravel business. Plaintiffs contend that defendant removed gravel from their portion of the river bed. ① Defendant contends that part of the gravel alleged to have been taken from plaintiffs’ property was taken from defendant’s portion of the bed of the. stream, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Diana Shooting Club v. HustingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. McFarrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Wynn v. SundquistOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Ayre v. HixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bloedel Timberlands Development, Inc. v. Timber Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Proctor v. HinkleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. People v. SextonColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Lethin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984
  5. Basin Electric Power Cooperative the Coteau Properties Company Dakota Coal Company v. Anr Western Coal Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API