Legal Opinion

Alaska Public Employees Ass'n v. City of Fairbanks

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1988No. S-2181PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This appeal presents a single question: whether the compulsory binding arbitration right provided in AS 23.40.200(b) applies to all employees in a particular bargaining unit, when some of the employees belong to classes not expressly given the statutory right. We hold that the statute does not provide arbitration rights for all employees in a mixed bargaining unit; therefore, we affirm.

Fairbanks is a municipality covered by the Alaska Public Employment Relations Act, AS 23.40.070-.260. By decision of the state agency which administers the Act, 1 the city was divided into…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. CampbellAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Wien Air Alaska, Inc. v. Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Millman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  3. Keane v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Enders v. ParkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Curran v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API