Anthony H. Dye v. State of Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
1DissentMassa, J.
As I read it, the serious violent felon statute is not a progressive penalty statute and therefore is not subject to the general prohibition against double enhancement. Even assuming it was, though, I believe Indiana’s General Assembly has provided sufficient guidance that a habitual offender sentencing enhancement is permissible.
These reasons are explained in greater detail below, and lead me to respectfully dissent.
I. The Serious Violent Felon Statute Is Not a Progressive Penalty Statute
First, I disagree with this Court’s prior determination that Indiana Code § 35-47-4-5 (the “SVF…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matthews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Freeman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Haymaker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.