Mills v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Justice.
While Corey Mills argues correctly that a person convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon may not have his or her sentence enhanced under the general habitual offender statute by proof of the same felony used to establish that the person was a “serious violent felon,” Mills is not entitled to the post-conviction relief he seeks here. Mills relinquished the right to challenge this aspect of his sentence when he pled guilty.
Background
In the fall of 2002, the State filed criminal charges against Corey Mills for (1) carrying a handgun without a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Brightman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Nicoson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Robertson Fowler, III v. Keith ButtsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Pedraza v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Anthony H. Dye v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Anthony H. Dye v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.